dreadedcandiru2 (dreadedcandiru2) wrote,

On wasting perfectly good characters: Molly, Gayle and April

What a lot of people who follow the strip kind of don't remember because we were too busy watching Mike be a lousy boyfriend and Elly angsting because she was doomed to diaper pails and kindergarten at forty is that at some point between 3 November 1988 and 9 March 1993, Connie's step-daughters went from "being mentioned off camera" to "moving away from Milborough because reasons". This, of course, is owing to Lynn's belief that she had too many characters anyway....by which she seems to mean "she can't spend too much time not focused on the Pattersons' doings."

The reason that I mention this is that Lynn's shortcomings meant that she had to create a new character in order to implement the standard sitcom plot "adolescent child chafes under the rule of someone else's slightly older daughter" when Liz aims a fire extinguisher at one of John's employees six years from now. If she'd kept one of the Thomas girls around instead, we could have had wacky sitcom hijinx much earlier.
Tags: lynn: failed creator, molly and gayle

  • Continuity gets sent to a "nice farm".

    I think that it's fair to say that up until now, Martha has taken most of the initiative in her doomed relationship with Michael. If that passive…

  • Prepubescent, precocious and preposterous.

    As I said last time, the reason we never see Molly or Gayle again is that Lynn decided that at twelve years of age, Michael was finally old enough a…

  • Kidlit April: a warning.

    As we all know, Lynn has made vague comments about projects that never materialize owing to her being done telling the Pattersons' story and not…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.