dreadedcandiru2 (dreadedcandiru2) wrote,

On ruining the spirit of volunteerism.

As we all know, one of our favourite reasons to be angered by the Pattersons is watching them get floored by the fact that Mike picked them up from the airport without being asked. It amazed them that Mike did something nice for them without having to nag and nag because they remember him as being unwilling to help without a lot of prodding beforehand and having his hand out looking for cash to buy junk with afterward. What's more, they can never remember him doing anything to a standard they hold reasonable. He always seemed to do a lousy job and ask a lot of stupid questions. What they can't get is that the reason why he was reluctant to help was contained in the sentences I just typed.

First off, they never seemed to want to see that a child needs more of a reward out of life than knowing that he's made his parents happy. As the roller skating and Mother's Day 1985 arcs remind us, John and Elly seem to believe that the only benefit Mike should expect for his hard work is knowing that he has done something nice for parents who can't seem to express gratitude no matter what he does.

This lack of gratitude seems to stem from a belief that the people in their immediate surroundings are living vending machines meant to hand them unearned goodies because they need to be compensated for non-existent privations and fictitious sacrifices. Since people exist to make them feel good about being themselves by paying them tribute, praising them for being true to their essential nature seems as baffling to the Pattersons as praising them fo registering a pulse. This means that Mike can't even be allowed to feel good about what he does and thus has no real incentive to help.

That being said, it's even more irritating to see them whine and growl and complain because he asks questions only to turn around and berate him for deliberately being mean to them and ruining their lives when their failure to understand that he can't see inside their brains means that he can't help BUT do a poor job because they're too mean-spirited and stupid to tell him how to do it right. This is owing to a subconscious need to sabotage him so they can whine and groan and grumble about how they're the only competent people ever and everyone is trying to make their lives worse.

This means that on the rare occasions that they're made aware that he's willing and able to do good work for people who appreciate his efforts and don't bust his ass for petty, stupid and self-serving reasons, they wonder why he can't do the same for bitter, entitled jerks who think that the world owes them a living because Daddy isn't made of walking dolls.
Tags: boomer lens-cap stupidity, john and elly versus their children, the vending machine syndrome

  • Dupe II: Meet The Pariah

    It isn't really surprising that a woman with Elly's character defects sees herself as locked in battle with her children. Should a child not be a…

  • On the fear of sadness.

    In about two weeks time, we're about to see a reminder of a nasty mental defect John has that hampers his life and makes him a less effective parent:…

  • On climate control and less than minimum work.

    The interesting thing about next week is that we're in for a round of what we call "zits and vacuuming" strips that serve as a sort of palate…

  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.